In a decision of 23 May , the Federal Arbitrazh Court of the Moscow Circuit confirmed the position previously taken by the Tenth Arbitrazh Appellate Court and by the Court of the Region of Moscow in respect of the domain name swatch. According to the Federal Court, the registrant of swatch. Russian legislation allows owners of well known brands to protect their rights also in the Internet. More and more courts in the Russian Federation agree to this point of view. It is a policy of Swatch not to tolerate cybersquatting of its trademarks and to take legal action against all third parties that infringe Swatch trademarks by using them for domain registrations. Only few months after the first bio-sourced Swatch launched in September , here comes a new and unique mix of ceramic and bio-sourced plastic — made by Swatch. The watches will be available at Swatch stores worldwide and swatch. The assortment features six….
оссийский доменный спор закончился победой Swatch и в федеральном окружном суде
Swatch wins Russian domain trial also at Federal Court
The most recent source for. All domain name holders, registrars and Arnes as the registry are bound by it. This procedure is also quick and inexpensive way of resolving domain name disputes but it does not exclude the possibility of using other legal remedies.
View current policy. Background: One of the new provisions added to the RAA requires ICANN to develop in consultation with registrars a webpage that identifies available registrant rights and responsibilities. This published document is the result of initial input from a joint working group of the GNSO Council and the At-Large Advisory Committee and subsequent consultations with the registrars; and provides a "plain language" summary of registrant rights and responsibilities that currently exist under the RAA. This document provides some "plain language" summarization of terms related to Registrant Rights and Responsibilities as set out in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement RAA , for posting on Registrar websites. This document also summarizes registrant rights and responsibilities that arise within ICANN Consensus Policies and specifications, as those policies and specifications are incorporated into the RAA. The summarization of terms within this document do not override or replace the terms set forth in the RAA or within those specifications or policy.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises, benefits and covenants contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt, adequacy and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Parent and the Customer, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:. The Customer agrees that Parent and Service Providers, and the contractors, employees, directors, officers, representatives, agents and affiliates, of Parent and Service Providers, are not liable for loss or damages that may result from any of the above. Terms of Usage Customer, or its contractors, employees, directors, officers, representatives, agents and affiliates and OrderBox Users, either directly or indirectly, shall not use or permit use of the Hosting Order, in violation of this Agreement, and for any of the activities described below -. For sending out promotional emails, email campaigns, etc. Upon detection of such mails going through the regular mailing system, such mails will get classified as spam even though the recipient might have opted in for receiving such mails. This would lead to immediate cessation of mail sending capabilities for the user or the domain name. Frequent violation would lead to permanent suspension of the domain name. On receipt of too many bounce back messages due to invalid recipient email addresses, the user sending such mails would get blocked. Such emails could be emanating from user s whose machine s are infected with a virus or malware and such activity could be happening without the user s knowledge or user s could be unknowingly sending out emails whose receivers may deem them as unsolicited.